<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Areca Tools RPM for CentOS Linux.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schwer.us/journal/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schwer.us/journal/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/</link>
	<description>Logging the activities of four Schwers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:07:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: augie</title>
		<link>http://www.schwer.us/journal/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-47002</link>
		<dc:creator>augie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwer.us/journal/?p=243#comment-47002</guid>
		<description>Sandon, we are using the ARC-1220 and only have it in two boxes at the moment.

Currently one of the boxes that runs a Xen kernel is exhibiting odd behavior, seemingly random resets, that we are currently investigating; the other box seems to be doing quite well and sees a good deal of I/O.

I have not tried migrating 3ware stained drives over to an Areca controller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandon, we are using the ARC-1220 and only have it in two boxes at the moment.</p>
<p>Currently one of the boxes that runs a Xen kernel is exhibiting odd behavior, seemingly random resets, that we are currently investigating; the other box seems to be doing quite well and sees a good deal of I/O.</p>
<p>I have not tried migrating 3ware stained drives over to an Areca controller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandon</title>
		<link>http://www.schwer.us/journal/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-47001</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwer.us/journal/?p=243#comment-47001</guid>
		<description>How are those arecaâ€™s working out for you and which models did you get? I work as a system administrator for a large managed shared web-hosting provider in Down Town Los Angeles and we might be making the same switch very soon. I have been pushing for Areca for quite some time when I saw low performance from 3ware 9650SE-8LPML controllers.

At first the solution was to switch from raid6 to raid10 and that didnâ€™t really help that much. We have major issues with high loads due to iowait and after testing some LSI cards I finally convinced some people to test out some arecaâ€™s. We got 2 of the ARC-1222â€™s and from my own testing they seem good but its not my decision so I am waiting to hear from my co-workers.

I use an ARC-1280ML in my home system (20Ã—1TB raid6) and my coloâ€™d box at work has an ARC-1220 (8Ã—750 GB raid5). I never have iowait issues on my dated ARC-1220 controller even when seeding a bunch of linux distro ISOs which is about as IO/heavy as things can get. All the machines are 2U super-micro systems with the 8x hot-swap bays. The slightly older systems are using 8Ã—750 GB seagate ES.2 drives and the newer ones are using the 1TB AS series (going with AS was not a good choice IMHO).

3ware has been really kick our asses not just because of performance but so far we already lost about 1% of 3TB of data due to an fsck being ran when one of the drives was messed up (getting bad sectors and what not) but the stupid 3ware controller didnâ€™t kick it out of the array. Another system got some error with the onboard cache sync and after rebooting the array was just gone. With a livecd and tw_cli it complained about the DCB being corrupt or something which I believe is the disk configuration block which has all the raid info in and is completely unrecoverable from on the 3ware controllers. On an areca you could re-create the array (assuming you knew the settings) and chose noinit and recover from that.

Anyway these 3wares have been leaving a bad taste in my mouth and I was curious of the experience of someone else who has used areca controllers in a large amount of machines. Have any problems with DOA or controllers dieing with the arecas?

Also I assumed it wasnâ€™t possible but I was curious if you have tried using drives from a 3ware controller and been able to use the array on an Areca?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are those arecaâ€™s working out for you and which models did you get? I work as a system administrator for a large managed shared web-hosting provider in Down Town Los Angeles and we might be making the same switch very soon. I have been pushing for Areca for quite some time when I saw low performance from 3ware 9650SE-8LPML controllers.</p>
<p>At first the solution was to switch from raid6 to raid10 and that didnâ€™t really help that much. We have major issues with high loads due to iowait and after testing some LSI cards I finally convinced some people to test out some arecaâ€™s. We got 2 of the ARC-1222â€™s and from my own testing they seem good but its not my decision so I am waiting to hear from my co-workers.</p>
<p>I use an ARC-1280ML in my home system (20Ã—1TB raid6) and my coloâ€™d box at work has an ARC-1220 (8Ã—750 GB raid5). I never have iowait issues on my dated ARC-1220 controller even when seeding a bunch of linux distro ISOs which is about as IO/heavy as things can get. All the machines are 2U super-micro systems with the 8x hot-swap bays. The slightly older systems are using 8Ã—750 GB seagate ES.2 drives and the newer ones are using the 1TB AS series (going with AS was not a good choice IMHO).</p>
<p>3ware has been really kick our asses not just because of performance but so far we already lost about 1% of 3TB of data due to an fsck being ran when one of the drives was messed up (getting bad sectors and what not) but the stupid 3ware controller didnâ€™t kick it out of the array. Another system got some error with the onboard cache sync and after rebooting the array was just gone. With a livecd and tw_cli it complained about the DCB being corrupt or something which I believe is the disk configuration block which has all the raid info in and is completely unrecoverable from on the 3ware controllers. On an areca you could re-create the array (assuming you knew the settings) and chose noinit and recover from that.</p>
<p>Anyway these 3wares have been leaving a bad taste in my mouth and I was curious of the experience of someone else who has used areca controllers in a large amount of machines. Have any problems with DOA or controllers dieing with the arecas?</p>
<p>Also I assumed it wasnâ€™t possible but I was curious if you have tried using drives from a 3ware controller and been able to use the array on an Areca?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
